That is why, as part of the readmission agreement, the expulsion of Afghans to Pakistan will allow europe to be deported to Afghanistan by carrying out “twists” from Europe to Afghanistan via Pakistan and, a fortiori, the European Parliament is taking the risk of voting in favour of the agreement to suspend the torture, inhuman and degrading, or even death, of those deported in complete ignorance of the international obligations of the EU and its Member States. In this regard, the agreement is aimed directly at Afghans. Second, we remember that Pakistan now hosts 1.7 million Afghan refugees fleeing war, 88% of whom live , as displaced people from Pakistan, in the north of the country, just where the floods took place across the country. In addition, Pakistan is in the middle of flood management “after.” (h) “Requesting State”: the State (Pakistan or one of the Member States) applying for readmission in accordance with Articles 2 and 3 or a request for readmission in accordance with Article 12; (1) A request for readmission must contain the following information: a request for a response to readmission must be processed within 30 days. In the absence of an answer, readmission is deemed accepted. This does not offer sufficient guarantees, as the return may be due to a simple delay in the procedure. With regard to restitution documents, the Pakistani authorities must issue the necessary travel documents to return “immediately”. It is not mentioned that readmission without these documents is legally impossible. In addition, European authorities are increasingly using the `European passport`, a travel document issued only by state authorities that reports it.
The use of this document is extremely worrying, as it could pave the way for many abuses by Member States, as was the case when France returned with some Afghans in December 2009. As a general rule, the European passport is not used when a third country in which the migrant is deported is subject to international governance or when the state is absent. 1. The application for readmission must be lodged with the competent authority of the state required with the competent authority of the state required with the competent authority of the required state, within a maximum of one year from the publication of the knowledge of the competent authority of the state required, so that the third country national or a stateless person does not meet or no longer meet the conditions of entry. , presence or stay. Where there are legal or real barriers to timely application, the deadline is extended on request, but only until the barriers no longer remain. The European Parliament must use its new veto over a readmission agreement. It must assert itself as a true co-legislator for the respect of human rights and, therefore, require a detailed analysis of the countries with which these agreements are signed.  Readmission agreements: a mechanism for the return of irregular migrants, DOC 12168, 16 March 2010. Committee on Refugees, Migration and The Population. Reporter Tineke Strik. The transfer of the person concerned must take place within three months of the approval of the application.
The Pakistani authorities and the Member State authorities agree on the transfer date, the border crossing and potential escorts. The parties agree that, in the event of a request for readmission from Member States with a maximum duration of 30 days or less in their national legislation, the 30-day calendar period covered by Article 8, paragraph 2, in the event of a positive response to the readmission request, includes the issuance of the travel document necessary for its readmission in accordance with Article 2 , paragraph 2, and Article 3, paragraph 4, of the agreement.